HRT Implant vs Patch for Perimenopause: Pros, Cons, and How to Choose
HRT implants and patches both deliver systemic estrogen but differ in dose control, convenience, and reversibility. Here's what you need to know.
Two Systemic HRT Options Worth Comparing
For women who need systemic hormone replacement therapy to manage perimenopausal symptoms, the transdermal patch and the subcutaneous implant are two established delivery methods that work in fundamentally different ways. Both deliver estrogen throughout the body, addressing symptoms such as hot flashes, night sweats, mood disturbance, sleep problems, and joint pain. However, they differ in how levels are controlled, how long they last, and how easy they are to adjust or stop. These differences matter for practical decision-making and for managing the treatment over time.
How Patches Work
Transdermal estrogen patches are applied to the skin and replaced every three to four days or twice weekly depending on the formulation. They release a steady, predictable dose of estradiol through the skin into the bloodstream. Patches come in multiple dose strengths, making it straightforward to increase or decrease the dose at any clinic appointment. Combination patches containing both estrogen and a progestogen are available for women who have a uterus and need uterine protection. Starting, stopping, or adjusting patch treatment is simple: the patch is applied or removed and hormone levels respond within a day or two. This flexibility is one of their main advantages.
How Implants Work
Subcutaneous hormone implants are small pellets, around the size of a grain of rice, inserted under the skin of the lower abdomen or buttock in a minor procedure under local anaesthetic. They release estradiol continuously over several months, typically lasting between four and eight months before a new implant is needed. Testosterone implants are also available and are sometimes inserted at the same time. Implants provide stable hormone levels without the need for daily or weekly application, which suits women who find frequent changes inconvenient or who struggle with patch adherence. However, once inserted, an implant cannot be removed easily if side effects occur, and the dose cannot be adjusted until it is exhausted.
Dose Control and Reversibility
This is the most clinically significant difference between the two. Patches allow precise, adjustable dosing that can be titrated up or down at each review appointment. If a dose is too high or too low, the change takes effect quickly. If HRT needs to be stopped for any reason, removal of the patch brings levels down within days. Implants offer no such flexibility. Once inserted, the estrogen level will rise and then gradually decline over months. Some women develop tachyphylaxis with implants, meaning they perceive symptom return before the implant is depleted and request replacement before levels have actually fallen, leading to progressively rising estrogen levels over successive implants. This is a recognised complication that requires careful monitoring.
Convenience and Lifestyle Fit
For women who value simplicity and minimal ongoing effort, implants offer a significant convenience advantage. After a brief insertion procedure, there is nothing to remember for months. There are no patches to change, no gels to apply, and no risk of forgetting a dose during a busy week. Patches can partially detach in hot weather or with vigorous exercise, and some women find adhesive marks on the skin a nuisance. However, patches can be applied privately at home, whereas implants require a clinical visit for each insertion, which some NHS areas do not routinely offer, making private clinics more often the route for implant-based HRT.
Availability and Cost
Patches are widely available on NHS prescription in the UK and are a standard first-line HRT option. Implants are available on the NHS but access is inconsistent; many women pursue them through private menopause clinics where they are more routinely offered alongside testosterone. The cost of private implant insertion varies by clinic but typically ranges from a few hundred pounds per insertion. In the United States, hormone pellet therapy (the equivalent of implants) is not FDA-approved in the same way and is offered primarily through private or functional medicine practitioners, making it important to seek out clinicians with specific expertise in this delivery method.
Choosing the Right Option
For most women starting HRT for the first time, a patch is the more practical choice because dose flexibility is important during the initial months of treatment when finding the right level takes time. For women who have been on a stable HRT dose for some time and find the logistics of patch changes burdensome, an implant may offer a meaningful quality-of-life improvement. The decision should be made with a menopause specialist rather than on convenience alone. Logging symptoms thoroughly in the months leading up to your appointment, using a tool like PeriPlan to capture patterns in hot flashes, mood, and sleep, gives your clinician the information they need to help you choose the most appropriate delivery method and starting dose.
Related reading
Get your personalized daily plan
Track symptoms, match workouts to your day type, and build a routine that adapts with you through every phase of perimenopause.